India has one of the largest and diverse education systems in the world. Privatization, widespread expansion, increased autonomy and introduction of Programmes in new and emerging areas have improved access to higher education. At the same time, it has also led to widespread concern on the quality and relevance of the higher education. To address these concerns, the National Policy on Education (NPE, 1986) and the Programme of Action (PoA, 1992) spelt out strategic plans for the policies, advocated the establishment of an independent National accreditation agency. Consequently, the National Assessment and Accreditation Council (NAAC) was established in 1994 as an autonomous institution of the University Grants Commission (UGC) with its Head Quarter in Bengaluru. The mandate of NAAC as reflected in its vision statement is in making quality assurance an integral part of the functioning of Higher Education Institutions (HEIs).
The NAAC functions through its General Council (GC) and Executive Committee (EC) comprising educational administrators, policy makers and senior academicians from a cross-section of Indian higher education system. The Chairperson of the UGC is the President of the GC of the NAAC, the Chairperson of the EC is an eminent academician nominated by the President of GC (NAAC). The Director is the academic and administrative head of NAAC and is the member secretary of both the GC and the EC. In addition to the statutory bodies that steer its policies and core staff to support its activities NAAC is advised by the advisory and consultative committees constituted from time to time.
Extended Profile | |||
---|---|---|---|
No | Title | Link | |
1.1.1 | 1.1 List of courses offered across all programs during last five years | ||
2.2.1 | Number of seats earmarked for reserved category as per GOI/State Gvt rule year-wise during last five years |
|
|
3.2.1 | Number of sanctioned posts year-wise during last five years |
|
Curricular Criteria 2 - Teaching Learning and Evaluation (225) | |||
---|---|---|---|
No | Title | Link | |
2.1.1 |
Average Enrolment percentage (Average of last five years)
A. Sanction of intake and Approved admission list program-wise 20-21 B. Sanction of intake and Approved admission list program-wise 19-20 C. Sanction of intake and Approved admission list program-wise 18-19 D. Sanction of intake and Approved admission list program-wise 17-18 E. Sanction of intake and Approved admission list program-wise 16-17 |
|
|
2.1.2 |
Average percentage of seats filled against seats reserved for various categories
A. 2.1.2 _ GO issued by state government B. 2.1.2 reserved category letters from affiliating university |
|
|
2.2.2 |
Student- Full time teacher ratio
A. Dr.Divakar B. Dr. SathisKumar C. Dr.V.Ravisankar D. Dr. Harani Avasarala |
|
|
2.3.1 | Student centric methods, such as experiential learning, participative learning and problem solving methodologies are used for enhancing learning experiences | ||
2.3.2 | Teachers use ICT enabled tools for effective teaching-learning process. | ||
2.3.3 |
Approved mentor list for the year 20-21 |
|
|
2.4.1 |
Average percentage of full time teachers against sanctioned posts during the last five years
Santioned Posts
B. Faculty members against sanctioned post |
|
|
2.4.2 |
Average percentage of full time teachers with Ph. D. / D.M. / M.Ch. / D.N.B Super speciality / D.Sc. / D.Litt. during the last five years
A. 4 MEMBERS Phd B. Dr.Divakar C. Dr.Sathiskumar D. Dr.Ravishankar E. Dr.Harani |
|
|
2.4.3 |
Average teaching experience of full time teachers in the same institution
A. 2.4.3 EXP CERTIFICATE B. 2.4.3 EXP CERTIFICATE C. 2.4.3 EXP CERTIFICATE D. 2.4.3 EXP CERTIFICATE |
|
|
2.5.1 | Mechanism of internal assessment is transparent and robust in terms of frequency and mode | ||
2.5.2 | Mechanism to deal with internal/external examination related grievances is transparent, time- bound and efficient | ||
2.6.1 | Programme and course outcomes for all Programmes offered by the institution are stated and displayed on website and communicated to teachers and students. | ||
2.6.2 | Attainment of programme outcomes and course outcomes are evaluated by the institution. | ||
2.6.3 |
Average pass percentage of Students during last five years
A. JNTUCE2020_21 B. JNTUCE2019_20 C. JNTUCE2018_19 D. JNTUCE2017_18 E. JNTUCE2016_17 |
|
|
2.7.1 | Student satisfaction Survey last five years |
Criteria 6 - Governances, Leadership and Management (92) | |||
---|---|---|---|
No | Title | Link | |
6.1.1 |
The governance of the institution is reflective of and in tune with the vision and mission of the institution
A. Additional links |
||
6.1.2 |
The effective leadership is visible in various institutional practices such as decentralization and participative management
A. Committees List |
||
6.2.1 |
The institutional Strategic/ perspective plan is effectively deployed
A. Additional Links |
||
6.2.2 |
The functioning of the institutional bodies is effective and efficient as visible from policies, administrative setup, appointment and service rules, procedures, etc.
A. HR Policy B. ORGANOGRAM |
||
6.2.3 |
Implementation of e-governance in areas of operation
A. E- Governance policy, Vendor Invoice B. ERP Document, User Interface Screens |
||
6.3.1 |
Effective welfare measures for faculty and staff
A. AUDIT STATEMENT 2020-2021 B. AUDIT STATEMENT 2019-2020 C. AUDIT STATEMENT 2018-2019 D. AUDIT STATEMENT 2017-2018 E. AUDIT STATEMENT 2016-2017 |
||
6.3.2 |
Average percentage of teachers provided with financial support to attend conferences/workshops and towards membership fee of professional bodies during the last five years
A. 2020-2021 B. 2019-2020 C. 2018-2019 D. 2017-2018 E. 2016-2017 |
|
|
6.3.3 |
Average number of professional development /administrative training programs organized by the institution for teaching and non-teaching staff
A. 2016-2017 B. 2017-2018 C. 2018-2019 D. 2019-2020 |
|
|
6.3.4 |
Average percentage of teachers undergoing online/ face-to-face Faculty Development Programmes (FDP)
A. 2020-2021 B. 2019-2020 C. 2018-2019 |
|
|
6.3.5 |
Institutions Performance Appraisal System for teaching and non-teaching staff
A. Performance Appraisal |
||
6.4.1 |
Institution conducts internal and external financial audits regularly
A. Audit for 2020-21 B. Audit for 2019-20 C. Audit for 2018-19 D. Audit for 2017-18 E. Audit for 2016-17 |
||
6.4.2 | Funds / Grants received from non-government bodies, individuals, philanthropists during the last five years (not covered in Criterion III and V) (INR in Lakhs) | ||
6.4.3 |
Institutional strategies for mobilisation of funds and the optimal utilisation of resources
A. 2021-2022 B. 2020-2021 C. 2019-2020 D. 2018-2019 E. 2017-2018 |
||
6.5.1 |
Internal Quality Assurance Cell (IQAC) has contributed significantly for institutionalizing the quality assurance strategies and processes
A. IQAC Objectives B. IQAC MEETINGS |
||
6.5.2 |
The institution reviews its teaching learning process, structures & methodologies of operations and learning outcomes at periodic intervals through IQAC set up as per norms and recorded the incremental improvement in various activities
A. Pharma |
||
6.5.3 |
Quality assurance initiatives of the institution
A. ISO B. NIRF |
|
Criteria 7 - Institutional Values and Best Practices (100) | |||
---|---|---|---|
No | Title | Link | |
7.1.1 |
Measures initiated by the Institution for the promotion of gender equity during the last five years
A. Annual Gender Sensitization Action Plan B. Specific Facilities Provided for the Women |
||
7.1.2 | The Institution has facilities for alternate sources of energy and energy conservation measures |
|
|
7.1.3 | The facilities in the Institution for the management of the degradable and non-degradable waste | ||
7.1.4 |
Water conservation facilities available in the Institution
A. 7.1.4 water conservationfacilities |
|
|
7.1.5 |
Green campus initiatives
A. 7.1.5 merged geotagged photos B. 7.1.5 geotagged photos with description C. policy document |
|
|
7.1.6 |
Quality audits on environment and energy are regularly undertaken by the institution
B. activities |
|
|
7.1.7 |
The Institution has disabled-friendly, barrier free environment
A. 7.1.7 ALL PICS B. 7.1.7 GEOAGGED PHOTOS WITH DESCRIPTION |
|
|
7.1.8 | The Institutional efforts/initiatives in providing an inclusive environment | ||
7.1.9 | Sensitization of students andemployees of the Institution to the constitutional obligations | ||
7.1.10 |
The Institution has a prescribed code of conduct for students, teachers, administrators and other staff and conducts periodic programmes in this regard
A. 7.1.10 |
|
|
7.1.11 | Institution celebrates /organizes national and internationalcommemorative days, events andfestivals | ||
7.2 | Best Practices-Any other relevant information | ||
7.3 | Institutional Distinctiveness-Any other relevant information |
Criteria 1 - Curricular Aspects (75) | |||
---|---|---|---|
No | Title | count | Link |
Curricular Criteria 2 - Teaching Learning and Evaluation (225) | |||
---|---|---|---|
No | Title | count | Link |
Curricular Criteria 3 - Research, Innovations and Extension (120) | |||
---|---|---|---|
No | Title | count | Link |
Criteria 4 - Infrastructure and Learning Resources (71) | |||
---|---|---|---|
No | Title | count | Link |
Criteria 5 - Student Support and Progression (130) | |||
---|---|---|---|
No | Title | count | Link |
Criteria 6 - Governances, Leadership and Management (92) | |||
---|---|---|---|
No | Title | count | Link |
Criteria 7 - Institutional Values and Best Practices (100) | |||
---|---|---|---|
No | Title | count | Link |